Read Conciliator-Mediator _ The court held
Justice flooded, slow, unjust? With the approval of the new figure introduced judicial by this government with
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Designer Mens Wallets Sale
Legislative Decree No 20 March 28 of 2010 
The rule will be 'a complete system only since March 2011, the date from which, for proceedings under
listed, we must' appear before the Conciliator
-real rights
-division -hereditary succession -pacts family -location -loan -rental companies -compensation for damage caused by vehicles and vessels from liability and medical - with the defamation through the press or other means of advertising -
contracts of insurance, banking and financial
.
but should 'carefully consider the risk' of cost introduced by this Decree. In fact, as mentioned above, one of the characteristics of greatest impact and interest to the people and 'date of its imposition conciliation before it can apply to a cause.
Suppose, for example. a fine of 60 €. We
as double the amount if payment has not followed the terms of the statutory 15 days. of its notification. If you think I'm in reason, plausible reason of a dilemma, but still likely to win, the new law requires me to ask for conciliation before the Ombudsman. Until the definition of costs will apply ministerial 'Ministerial Decree No 223, 1004, where up to the amount of 1000 € you will have 'support at a cost of 40 €, plus a sum to start the procedure required only 30 €.
In essence, the uncertainty of payment of the fine is added instead of the certainty of a cost of € 70 just to open conciliation. But if 'I were to lose then you add to it the amount of 60 € the most fined' fees incurred by the other party. How EDIC, to defend my risk of paying € 60 200. aldunque One wonders where lies the equity 'to small social and countless disputes, also the subject of heavy litigation costs if justice requires me to affect my right to defense?? Sore current. Perhaps the legislature could make the channel conciliatory already 'provided for in our legal system and applicable in the following cases:
arbitrations, negotiations and court settlements, the attempt required conciliation in labor disputes, the attempt to settle before the Corecom for disputes relating to telecommunications, the powers of the court pursuant to art. 185 CPC and a number of bodies of mediation already 'active
(Emmanuel Bertucci)
www.consumatori.myblog.it
Another note to consider carefully and 'the
choose their place of conciliation
. The rule at the time is coming to the competitor who first requires mediation. Let Rossi, who lives in Udine Sues White lives in Croton. And white 'unless forced to appear warrants. But here the law is not 'still very clear. Try pero 'just think about the consequences of this'.
E 'this "taxation" on more characterize this bill and who pays?
More information and details you can find them on the site
www.ipsoa.it
www.studiocataldi.it
Related
Suppose, for example. a fine of 60 €. We
as double the amount if payment has not followed the terms of the statutory 15 days. of its notification. If you think I'm in reason, plausible reason of a dilemma, but still likely to win, the new law requires me to ask for conciliation before the Ombudsman. Until the definition of costs will apply ministerial 'Ministerial Decree No 223, 1004, where up to the amount of 1000 € you will have 'support at a cost of 40 €, plus a sum to start the procedure required only 30 €.
In essence, the uncertainty of payment of the fine is added instead of the certainty of a cost of € 70 just to open conciliation. But if 'I were to lose then you add to it the amount of 60 € the most fined' fees incurred by the other party. How EDIC, to defend my risk of paying € 60 200. aldunque One wonders where lies the equity 'to small social and countless disputes, also the subject of heavy litigation costs if justice requires me to affect my right to defense?? Sore current. Perhaps the legislature could make the channel conciliatory already 'provided for in our legal system and applicable in the following cases:
arbitrations, negotiations and court settlements, the attempt required conciliation in labor disputes, the attempt to settle before the Corecom for disputes relating to telecommunications, the powers of the court pursuant to art. 185 CPC and a number of bodies of mediation already 'active
(Emmanuel Bertucci)
www.consumatori.myblog.it
He could have create the new legislation taking advantage of a service already 'exists, making it free of charge in proportion to the amount in dispute and avoid further aggravation of the court costs. I note that this service may 'also be managed by private entities, although I admit that this' already 'is widely applied in the reconciliation of work through the trade union bodies, but where' unlikely the employer will figure out how to free enterprise.
Another note to consider carefully and 'the
choose their place of conciliation
. The rule at the time is coming to the competitor who first requires mediation. Let Rossi, who lives in Udine Sues White lives in Croton. And white 'unless forced to appear warrants. But here the law is not 'still very clear. Try pero 'just think about the consequences of this'.
E 'this "taxation" on more characterize this bill and who pays?
More information and details you can find them on the site
www.ipsoa.it
www.studiocataldi.it
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment